Submitter
SUPPORT TOPIC File Information
- Submitted: Mar 17 2017 10:29 AM
- Last Updated: Mar 17 2017 10:30 AM
- File Size: 917.91K
- Views: 3474
- Downloads: 191
- Author: Dr. Ivan Panin
- theWord Version: 3.x - 4.x
- Tab Name: NENT
- Suggest New Tag:: numerics, new testament
Support WordModules.com
-
If our theWord modules have blessed you, please consider a small donation.
Your donation pays the actual, out-of-pocket expenses of running this ministry.
Your donation pays only for dedicated server hosting, bandwidth, software licenses, and capital equipment (scanners, OCR equipment, etc).
theWord Module Download:
Download
Numeric English New Testament v.1
2 Votes
1
Author:
Dr. Ivan Panin
theWord Version:
3.x - 4.x
Tab Name:
NENT
Suggest New Tag::
numerics, new testament
Source
A conversion using http://www.biblesupp...-new-testament/ as a source. Conversion software used is https://trumpet-call.org/software/. Original source material is from http://www.ubm1.org/?page=ubmbooks
Please check out the source links for indepth information.
Other files you may be interested in ..
- 1,295 Total Files
- 11 Total Categories
- 98 Total Contributors
- 1,211,912 Total Downloads
- Son Of Man Bible Latest File
- anapto Latest Submitter
53 user(s) are online (in the past 30 minutes)
1 members, 52 guests, 0 anonymous users
The NENT claims to be translated from "the only authentic Greek NT." This Greek NT was originally published in 1934 by Ivan Panin. There is a reprint from 1975 available in PDF format at http://www.ubm1.org/books/pdf/NGNT.pdf. I checked this Greek text; I could not find any differences from that of Westcott-Hort, and only a few minor differences from Tischendorf's. With one exception; the only real noticeable difference is the order in which the books of the NT appear.
When I read something like "only authentic Greek NT,' caution flags go up in my mind. What makes Panin’s Greek text better than those published previously? There are no differences apparent in the Greek text. Panin claims it is the “only authentic” because he adopted what he considers the best reading among textual variants because a particular reading fits best into his numeric codes method. He ignores any other form of textual criticism. Panin uses this numeric codes method as proof that the Bible is inspired. Do we really need that to believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God? I think not. Even with that, his codes clearly do not fit some sections of scripture. Does this mean those sections are not inspired? Of course not.
Here are 2 brief critiqes of Panin's codes methodology: http://www.bibletopi...blestudy/83.htm and https://petrostelos....panin-numerics/.
That said, I could not recommend this module for the serious Bible student.