Warning: Illegal string offset 'html' in /home/wordmodules/cache/skin_cache/cacheid_1/skin_topic.php on line 975 Commentaries - Adam Clarke's 1810-1825 commentary and critical notes on the Bible: - theWord Modules

Jump to content


Commentaries - Adam Clarke's 1810-1825 commentary and critical notes on the Bible:


  • You cannot reply to this topic
No replies to this topic

#1 wlue777

    theWord Fanatic

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 168 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 04:47 PM

File Name: Adam Clarke's 1810-1825 commentary and critical notes on the Bible:
File Submitter: wlue777
File Submitted: 04 Jun 2012
File Category: Commentaries
Author: Adam Clarke
theWord Version: 3.2.x
Suggest New Tag:: twm the word module notes wlue777

Adam Clarke - British Methodist theologian and Biblical scholar

Posted Image
Source: Wikipedia
Clarke is chiefly remembered for writing a commentary on the Bible which took him forty years to complete and which was a primary Methodist theological resource for two centuries.
As a theologian, Clarke reinforced the teachings of Methodist founder John Wesley. He taught that the Bible provides a complete interpretation of God's nature and will. He considered Scripture itself a miracle of God's grace that "takes away the veil of darkness and ignorance." With such an understanding, Clarke was first and foremost a Biblical theologian, often uneasy with purely systematic approaches to theology.
Clarke followed Wesley in opposing a Calvinistic scheme of salvation, preferring instead the Wesleyan-Arminian positions regarding predestination, prevenient grace, the offer of justification from God to all persons, entire sanctification, and assurance of salvation. Perhaps his most controversial position regarded the eternal Sonship of Jesus. Clarke did not believe it Biblically faithful to affirm this doctrine, maintaining that prior to the Incarnation, Jesus was "unoriginated." Otherwise, according to Clarke, he would be subordinate to God and therefore not fully divine. This was important to Clarke because he felt that Jesus' divinity was crucial to understanding the atonement.
Clarke's view was opposed by many Methodists, notably Richard Watson. Watson and his allies argued that Clarke's position jeopardized the integrity of the doctrine of the trinity. Clarke's view was rejected by Methodism in favor of the traditional, orthodox perspective.
(from Wikipedia)

Click here to download this file





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic has been visited by 12 user(s)